Children with type 2 diabetes may achieve better
blood sugar control with a combination of two drugs, metformin and
Avandia, than with metformin alone, a new study suggests.
However, Avandia (rosiglitazone) was recently linked
to an increased risk of heart attack and stroke, so it
may not be the
best drug for these young patients, experts say.
“Many kids with type 2 have a rapidly progressive
disease requiring early onset of insulin therapy, and current approaches
to oral therapy may be inadequate,” said lead researcher, Dr. Philip
Zeitler, a professor of medicine at the University of Colorado, Denver.
Zeitler noted that the choice of Avandia as a
companion medication was made in 2002, before the cardiac problems with
the drug were known.
“Given the problems with rosiglitazone, we are not
recommending it at this time,” he said. “However, no problems with
rosiglitazone have been noted in [the study participants] to date,
though the cohort size is too small for a thorough safety analysis.”
The report was published online in the New England
Journal of Medicine, to coincide with a planned presentation of the
finding at the Paediatric Academic Societies’ annual meeting in Boston.
The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
funded the research.
For the study, almost 700 obese children, aged 10 to
17, with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to metformin alone,
metformin plus Avandia or metformin along with intensive lifestyle
changes in diet and exercise.
Over the course of 46 months, the researchers found
that metformin alone did not adequately control blood sugar levels in
51.7 per cent of patients. Among those who received metformin and
lifestyle changes, 46.6 per cent did not have their blood sugar
controlled.
However, among those taking metformin and Avandia,
blood sugar levels were not well-controlled in only 38.6 per cent of
patients, the researchers found.
In addition, blood sugar control was harder to achieve in black and Hispanic children, they added.
“Metformin is probably not as effective as we’ve
assumed, and additional treatment approaches are urgently needed in this
population of adolescents with a steadily progressive form of
diabetes,” Zeitler said.
In terms of lifestyle changes, Zeitler isn’t sure why
they didn’t work better. Part of the reason may be tied to children’s
reluctance to adopt new diet and exercise habits, he said.
Director of the clinical diabetes centre at
Montefiore Medical Center in New York City, Dr. Joel Zonszein, said that
“type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents is a calamity, because we
don’t have any good medications.”
Type 2 diabetes in children is particularly aggressive and can lead to heart and liver problems at a very young age, he said.
“It is not surprising that combination is better than
mono-therapy,” Zonszein said. “We want to be aggressive in treating
type 2 diabetes in children, but we have to balance the risk and
benefits of these drugs. But, we really don’t have good data and good
medications to treat children.”
Another expert, Dr. Spyros Mezitis, an
endocrinologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, added that “we
need a whole new set of studies to see how to treat type 2 diabetes in
children.”
Dr. David B. Allen, from the department of
paediatrics at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public
Health in Madison, said that “calories consumed in excess of expended
is leading to an epidemic of early-life type 2 diabetes, the burden of
which is falling disproportionately on disadvantaged youth.”
This latest study shows that, once children develop
the condition, it is very difficult to prevent deterioration in spite of
intensive lifestyle changes or medications, he said.
Leave a comment...thanks!
No comments:
Post a Comment